The last person who used that song was a fat retard from Atlanta who called himself (cold bowl of) Chili, in real life a fairly uneducated rightwing housefather with a liking for tequila, wrestling and country music. He didn't like it when I said the LIB-CON thing doesn't apply on the whole world. You can prolly find it on google if you don't believe me, it's in some blog discussing Neil Youngs Living with war.
Maybe you are him tho. AND that Claire Flaherty woman. That would be just sweet.
"I'll never get these people who theorise that all the people they ever get into a fight with are somehow the same person."
Maybe you didn't get it, but in this case that theory was based on the fact you're saying exactly the same retarded things, which makes you boring. Apart from that I never had a fight with Claire, nor did I know you are actually trying to fight me, I am still pointing and kind of laughing to be honest.
"I am not arguing, sweetheart. I think I said that a few times tho so you could say that's what we are arguing about."
Um, then what have the last several pages been about?
Nothing annoys me more than when in an argument, someone says "I'm not really arguing" and then - Oh Boy! Logic and reason no longer have to apply to that person since they're "not Really arguing". Even though someone is putting forward a motion, and they're attempting to counter it(badly).
This is another classic tactic used by people who can't defend themselves. I might as well make the rest of my posts songs about your name.
"Never said that. Unless you want to call your song an argument?"
No, it was to test your own sense of humour since you're so terribly upset at my upset over your game. And er, you kind of did. Not to mention you started this topic implying I was an "unstable person".
"Yes, I am laughing. You are UPSET about a name of a character in a freeware game and tell me "not to do it again". How can I not laugh? Entertain me, do it do me"
You started off this topic taking the tone of fuckwit, and you continue to be a fuckwit. You laugh because it's something stupid people do when they can't do anything else. Why are you celebrating this fact? What leg up does laughing like an idiot give you, exactly?
Check out my Telekinesis'em'up Thread and the ALICE Machines -
I started this because we were wasting a fine thread, but mainly to make fun of you as I like being an asshole. As far as people go who are too weak to defend themselves, aren't you the one who went to making fun of my name and telling me I can't argue?
I never said your argument sucks (it does tho, haha), you just are an unstable depressed fucked up little girl and your cunt smells of fish. That's why I called you unstable.
But one last time, don't tell me what to do, ever, you smelly fake account.
"Um, then what have the last several pages been about?" - the spawn of your insecurities? (I don't need to justify that because I am not arguing as is no one else but you.)
"Nothing annoys me more than when in an argument, someone says "I'm not really arguing" " - Nothing annoys me when someone claims they are having an arguement yet they cannot define what the argument is all about. Refering to your question about the last several pages, 'nothing annoys me more' when someone argues against someone's comment about the correct way of arguing, and then bases their whole justification off an implication. Fucking hypocrisy.
"You started off this topic taking the tone of fuckwit, and you continue to be a fuckwit. You laugh because it's something stupid people do when they can't do anything else. Why are you celebrating this fact? What leg up does laughing like an idiot give you, exactly?"
You started off this topic taking the tone of fuckwit, and you continue to be a fuckwit. - Now define fuckwit and give evidence as to why this is the case. Did it just sound insulting? Does it make you feel better?
You laugh because it's something stupid people do when they can't do anything else. - I laugh all the time, and anyone who calls me stupid needs their head examined... oh you mean you used that in some kind of context? Ok explain the context and explain what one should be doing instead.
I hope you don't ignore any of the points I just made, that would be bad 'arguing'.