The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Digital Works ::. Different style of graphical work
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
22nd August, 2012 at 22/08/2012 21:36:06 -

I mostly don't use retro or pixel art style in my graphics. I perfer to use more realistic look(pixel and retro actually fits better on some type of games). How do you think it'll fit to a ww2 tactical top-down shooter. I've have been inspired (in graphics area) by micro-soft Close Combat series, Mark Pay's older games, and iFighter 1/2 just to mention few.

Image
Beginning of a forest fire.


Image
A little compound where 20 marines were ambushed by 30 nazis. (the little counter on the top right is total number of objects) (the 2 first red and blue indicates npc enemy/ npc friend total awareness+shooting ratio so far) (the lower 2 amount of npc's left) Too much added backdrops? Was the limit ~6000.. and what happens after that?


Image
Surprise invasion. I wasnt alive anymore.


Image
Driving over nazis with stolen Kubelwagen while my npc teammate slaughters them with a tommygun. (The vehicle engine is actually very complicated)


Give me feedback especially from the graphics.

edit1:I wouldn't suggest to check my projects page about this.. it's very old data, and about 300% of code, gfx, and sfx has been added.
edit2on't focus on the total actives counter at the top right. The map is very large and has a lot of unused actives in it. The game still runs perfectly on my old computer.

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

-Liam-

Cake Addict

Registered
  06/12/2008
Points
  556

Wii OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!Hero of TimeStrawberry
23rd August, 2012 at 23/08/2012 14:18:40 -

Some styles of art lend themselves to certain types of products more than others, but I still think you can make most styles fit to anything if you try hard enough. I think the style you're using fits a war game really well. The visuals remind me of really old, yet detailed PC games. Good job

 
Image

Tell 'em Babs is 'ere...

Deaval

It's my lap

Registered
  06/02/2008
Points
  146

360 Owner
26th August, 2012 at 26/08/2012 09:38:20 -

Good work, I find it somewhat resembling to Commandos.
Image
But that could just be the millitary setting, a setting you pull of rather well, I might add.

At first glance the things that feels out of place might be the guns. I guess you can pick those up, but think you overdid the white borders there. Without the borders on the guns I'm sure one can make the assumption to pick them up anyway.

The second thing would probably be the explosions that looks way too "pixly" compared to the landscape and characters.

Other than that, good work.

 
Image

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
26th August, 2012 at 26/08/2012 15:33:08 -


Originally Posted by Deaval
Good work, I find it somewhat resembling to Commandos.
Image
But that could just be the millitary setting, a setting you pull of rather well, I might add.

At first glance the things that feels out of place might be the guns. I guess you can pick those up, but think you overdid the white borders there. Without the borders on the guns I'm sure one can make the assumption to pick them up anyway.

The second thing would probably be the explosions that looks way too "pixly" compared to the landscape and characters.

Other than that, good work.



Thanks, and thanks for bringing up Commandos. I'll war.. i mean buy the series. Ah the memories.
I'm adding something: the trees are not cool. I decided to re-make them more realistic mid-European leaf trees. I also made spruce/fir -trees.

But to the comment.

Guns: Normally there are not that many guns on the playground since you have to pick them up. The gun spree you see there is from a bot fight. And bots don't pick up items. Also if there is a knife on a pavement, you can't see it without the outlines.

Explosions: Those arent explosions, they are stable fires. One of the games main setting is that everything, i mean everything can be both set in to fire, and break down(if possible. i.e. rocks don't burn). There is not one backdrop (even added) that is obstacle.

Here is a picture of fragment explosion. It has been tiny amount of time from the start of explosion in the red square. The big picture is after(from mr. obvious).
Image
tip to fellow klikkers:if your game have to have a lots of different looking explosions create explosion makers that are invisible and have values that change size, fragments, and particle types.

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
26th August, 2012 at 26/08/2012 16:48:17 -

Here is some random sprites from the game. Opinions?
The war machinery is accurately created from plans and images and are real ww2 stuff. I like realism.

Image
(the houses have roofs and rafters that go invisible when looked in, if buttresses or walls fall, they will of course fall down)

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
26th August, 2012 at 26/08/2012 22:33:57 -

I like the graphics. It looks like hand drawn realism, or somewhere between cartoon and reality. My only criticism is how some of the graphics integrate with the background. For example, there's a round brick pattern that repeats. I'm not clear on what that is. There are other patterns that do the same thing. They look stuck on. It looks like they were pasted in game?

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
27th August, 2012 at 27/08/2012 14:02:44 -

I couldn't find a pattern. Do you mean the brick walls of the left side of the roofless house?

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
27th August, 2012 at 27/08/2012 17:17:41 -

The red brick in the second and third pictures. They look a little too round, and flat, I think. It almost looks like a strange floor pattern. It's supposed to be rubble from the wall? I get it. The round shape is too uniform for rubble. It works for explosions, but not rubble. Other than that, I have nothing else to say about the graphics. It looks good.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
27th August, 2012 at 27/08/2012 19:35:26 -

You're right. I'll add that to my list.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

AndyUK

Mascot Maniac

Registered
  01/08/2002
Points
  14586

Game of the Week WinnerSecond GOTW AwardHas Donated, Thank You!VIP Member
27th August, 2012 at 27/08/2012 20:08:03 -

It's really good. Definitely pixel art but much more girrty than what you would expect to see from most Japanese console games at least.

The only criticism I could possibly make would be that the colours might be a little dark? If you look at games like Battlefield 3 you can see war games can still be really colourful.

http://bftips.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BF3-Caspian-Border-Tank-Jet.png

 
.

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
27th August, 2012 at 27/08/2012 20:23:45 -

There is more contrast in these new trees i'm making. But comparing these images, you made a good point. Although a little darkness adds a certain feeling. Or was it saturation..

Here is something new to comment on if you wish.

Image

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 05:24:08 -

Yes, contrast may be an issue, but the low contrast somehow fits the mood. It comes down to taste, I guess. See how many people want higher contrast, or like it as it is. I'm happy with how it looks now, but my taste may not reflect the norm.

When I was testing my last game, I had a tough time getting opinions from people. I even made a poll using google documents so that they could answer questions anonymously. You could try doing the same thing with friends and family if they're afraid to give you an honest opinion.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

s-m-r

Slow-Motion Riot

Registered
  04/06/2006
Points
  1078

Candle
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 12:10:21 -

One suggestion regarding the guns, explosives, and other items that the player can pick up...Why not leave off the white outlines? When the player approaches, then highlight the guns with a transparent, lighter shade of gray.

I suggest this to add to the realism, simulating that the areas and corpses must be searched before their contents can be found.

Just a thought. I'm typically not a fan of wargames, but the game honestly looks stunning, hapsi.

 
n/a

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 12:51:07 -

The weapon idea sounds good. In some fps games, the item starts to shine when you're near it. Does mmf2 have a shader or effect that could do that? I don't want to create it to all the items with an animation.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 18:36:05 -

If speed isn't an issue, why not add a hand icon object over the objects? If speed is an issue, you could have the object flash.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 22:35:13 -

No the speed isn't going to be an issue. I'll figure something out. Just pointing out that you shouldn't see weapons and items from too far, is something i didn't think of. Thanks

Anyhow.. I am going to release the sandbox beta as soon as i find the bug that just came up. The bug shuts the application. Also i have some ideas to polish the sandbox beta a little, and i can not have those ball looking trees in the published sb.

But, here is a railway oil carriages that i just made function today:


Heavily guarded beach house behind those oil carriages..

Image


Decided to blast the obstacle away..

Image

Got some damage on me too ..

Image


..and here is the aftermath. Some Dumb ass with a machine gun doesn't seem to give a fuck(top left)(NPC's only take their weapons in hand when seen threat).

Image

edit1: there seems to bee a tile displacement in the roof too.

[Sandbox beta news]
If someone wants to actually play the sandbox beta, give me something it should include. Right now it includes Creating 4 different team mates as many as you (or your (if slow) computer) wishes. And gives all the weapons in the start. There is different types of enemies, enemy Tiger 1 tank, and Kubelwagen to drive (car physics with collisions suck, otherwise they are fine). I left out Flak cannon (usable by enemies and pl), and npc enemy attack plane.

Any info about the sandbox or the graphics is appreciated.

[sorry of my english and complexity, im very tired --> sleep]

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

lembi2001



Registered
  01/04/2005
Points
  608

VIP MemberIt's-a me, Mario!Wii OwnerI like Aliens!Has Donated, Thank You!PS3 OwnerI am an April Fool
29th August, 2012 at 29/08/2012 18:21:35 -

Damn dude, this game looks impressive!!! I can't wait to get my hands on it.

 
n/a

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
30th August, 2012 at 30/08/2012 18:35:46 -

It's looking good! Those trains aren't moving, are they?

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
30th August, 2012 at 30/08/2012 20:12:43 -

No. But in my visions there is a mission where you have to sabotage the enemy fuel line [Blast the oil carriages from hide when they are moving] if you want an advantage in certain mission. I've planned that missions don't go like 1. 2. 3... but more like go where you want/need/ or have to go. It's all in my head still. Nothing's been decided.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
31st August, 2012 at 31/08/2012 19:53:08 -

I created a project page for a feedback-sandbox-beta:
http://create-games.com/project.asp?id=2349

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
1st September, 2012 at 01/09/2012 19:19:09 -

Finally figured out how they do those cool flamethrower effects.

Image

Oh it's missing the light effect. I added it.

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Jenswa

Possibly Insane

Registered
  26/08/2002
Points
  2722
1st September, 2012 at 01/09/2012 20:36:23 -

Nice flamethrower effect! Like the graphics also.

 
Image jenswa.neocities.org

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
2nd September, 2012 at 02/09/2012 20:26:17 -

Yeah, the flame looks really pro. Did you use 3 different layers of actives with transparency? That would take me days to make, and I'm not sure if I could make it that good. I'd like to see it animated.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

Pan-tosser



Registered
  24/10/2008
Points
  520

Has Donated, Thank You!
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 05:47:26 -

Your graphics style is indeed different and cool. Have you ever thought about writing an article explaining your methods and thought process.

The look is vary pulled together and professional looking. I would defently read the article if you wrote one.

 
https://www.facebook.com/nathon.brown.7

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 18:58:58 -


Originally Posted by Chris Donovan
Yeah, the flame looks really pro. Did you use 3 different layers of actives with transparency? That would take me days to make, and I'm not sure if I could make it that good. I'd like to see it animated.


I currently only have one layer in use. The flamer effect is done with this kind of active object that scales larger, rotates in cw or ccw, creates smoke, and has "add" effect.

Image


Here is version with the light effect:
edit: Ah fuck.. don't mind the lightness change in the ground in between player prone and the flames. The lighter ground there is a backdrop and a test area for the trees you see there.

Image

The player in prone is semitransparent since have not been seen.



Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:09:57 -


Originally Posted by Pan-tosser
Your graphics style is indeed different and cool. Have you ever thought about writing an article explaining your methods and thought process.

The look is vary pulled together and professional looking. I would defently read the article if you wrote one.



It would certainly be nice to write an article. I wish i didn't have to feed my family and use my time in work but i keep that in mind. Some of my methods you might find very weird and interesting. I.E. I can't actually draw very well(= i suck at drawing), but i think i can judge well.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:42:00 -


Originally Posted by Chris Donovan
The red brick in the second and third pictures. They look a little too round, and flat, I think. It almost looks like a strange floor pattern. It's supposed to be rubble from the wall? I get it. The round shape is too uniform for rubble. It works for explosions, but not rubble. Other than that, I have nothing else to say about the graphics. It looks good.



I think with your idea it does look better. Thanks.
Image

..and maybe do the same to the fallen metallic roof.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:53:01 -

Image



 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:54:35 -

Maybe it's off some dust...

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
4th September, 2012 at 04/09/2012 18:38:32 -

Evolution of a tree: is the final realistic enough..?

Image



 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
5th September, 2012 at 05/09/2012 06:18:04 -

Great stuff!

I get how the flamethrower works. Thanks for the details.

I think the tree looks good. It fits the style of the game and looks like it's supposed to.

The broken bricks work. They don't look flat and uniform.

Keep up the good work.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

Sketchy

Cornwall UK

Registered
  06/11/2004
Points
  1970

VIP MemberWeekly Picture Me This Round 43 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 47 WinnerPicture Me This Round 49 Winner!
6th September, 2012 at 06/09/2012 14:41:28 -

I can definitely see the "Close Combat" influence there. The style is very similar - the scale is just a little smaller (more zoomed-in).

From a gameplay point of view, I'd be worried that the level of micro-management required is far too great, considering the number of units under the player's control.
For example, I see that there are weapons which can be picked up - but noone is going to want to micro-manage the equipment of each of twenty soldiers (the small boost in firepower wouldn't be worth the immense tedium).
If the player only had a handful of units (like in "Commandos: Behind Enemy Lines"), then fine - it would be good to be able to switch weapons etc. But when they have a lot of units under their control, and there isn't sophisticated AI and pathfinding (so you can't trust your units to act intelligently without your direct supervision), that pretty much negates the possibility of any real strategy, and you're likely to end up with something more along the lines of "Cannon Fodder".
I can easily imagine a scenario where you have one guy with a flamethrower, and a bunch of others with rifles. You either spend all you time dealing with just the rifles or just the flamethrower, and ignoring the other(s) - or you try and use both together, and your flamethrower ends up torching all his buddies.

 
n/a

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
6th September, 2012 at 06/09/2012 19:15:11 -


Originally Posted by Sketchy
I can definitely see the "Close Combat" influence there. The style is very similar - the scale is just a little smaller (more zoomed-in).

From a gameplay point of view, I'd be worried that the level of micro-management required is far too great, considering the number of units under the player's control.
For example, I see that there are weapons which can be picked up - but noone is going to want to micro-manage the equipment of each of twenty soldiers (the small boost in firepower wouldn't be worth the immense tedium).
If the player only had a handful of units (like in "Commandos: Behind Enemy Lines"), then fine - it would be good to be able to switch weapons etc. But when they have a lot of units under their control, and there isn't sophisticated AI and pathfinding (so you can't trust your units to act intelligently without your direct supervision), that pretty much negates the possibility of any real strategy, and you're likely to end up with something more along the lines of "Cannon Fodder".
I can easily imagine a scenario where you have one guy with a flamethrower, and a bunch of others with rifles. You either spend all you time dealing with just the rifles or just the flamethrower, and ignoring the other(s) - or you try and use both together, and your flamethrower ends up torching all his buddies.



You have misunderstood the gameplay here (maybe it's my fault cause in screenshots there are like a platoon of npc's.. just testing the limits ). The only thing an npc friendly (if set to obey you), can do is either follow the player, or move to a direction you are holding with your mouse right(they have a waypoint system but that's not the point). If in follow status, they will prone and run if you do.

In final game i have planned that there is a little special unit, a few guys thrown in the middle of enemy territory. In sandbox beta you can create as many friendly units as mmf2 allows.

In result player is the key here. Friendly npc's might do a devastating damage (as will the enemy), but the player settles the ensemble. I.e. Send your friends to the enemy before yourself.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
6th September, 2012 at 06/09/2012 19:22:22 -

..and i'll have to add that the gameplay in final game will be pretty free: Choose to sneak around and knife everyone or take MG42, grenades and start blasting. All the mayhem you see in the screenshots isn't necessary.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
18th September, 2012 at 18/09/2012 20:44:38 -

Edit2: Updated the pictures. Flames are different, react to wind direction and speed, and fire spreads.

Now that i have had some free time, i made the flamethrower and the ability to burn everything that can be burnt done. Some bug fixes and adjustments since it seems that a flamethrower when i made it as realistic i could, seem too overwhelming.

Killed a squad of enemies. They start running around randomly when "in fire" -ratio is high enough. The flamer uses 32 directions only but it doesn't matter since the flame itself is pretty large. All bullet shooting guns use 360° with weapon related accuracy though.
Image

I made burning wood made buildings down possible. Great for smoking enemies out of buildings.
Image

After fire:
Image

The flamer is Flammenwerfer 41, a real german weapon of ww2 produced at 1941.

Any feedback from graphical, and any other aspect of the game.

Btw.. i need a royalty free screaming sound for enemies that run in pain when in in fire. Any sources?

I have this flat green golf field terrain. Any advice how to get it little(just a little) mountanious like in Total Annihilation's 2d maps:
Image

-------------------------------

Sandbox 1942 released:
Check my downloads page

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Codemonster

Administrator
Klik & Play Expert

Registered
  03/08/2008
Points
  133

I am an April Fool
24th September, 2012 at 24/09/2012 05:31:13 -

I have an idea:

Step one:
Put the grass texture onto a flat plane in a 3d program (most free ones will do)

Step two:
Modify the plane, add some bumps and ridges,

Step three:
Render an image from the top

Step four:
Some changes to the edges of the image will likely be needed (unless you are very very careful and can get a great render)

Edited by an Administrator

 
--
Jesse J

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
24th September, 2012 at 24/09/2012 08:59:28 -

I had the same idea.. the idea crushed down when the stupid fucking program didn't use the light map i made(height map it accepted). Also the program should have a "look at a direct top down view from every pixel" -option.

Maybe there is a way in photoshop to twist the texture. I mean more advanced than scale/rotate/etc.

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Sketchy

Cornwall UK

Registered
  06/11/2004
Points
  1970

VIP MemberWeekly Picture Me This Round 43 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 47 WinnerPicture Me This Round 49 Winner!
26th September, 2012 at 26/09/2012 13:44:34 -

Do you really need to deform the texture? If you have a lightmap already, can't you just give that a soft light shader effect (either in MMF2 or Photoshop)?

 
n/a

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
26th September, 2012 at 26/09/2012 17:16:07 -

With only a lightmap it doesn't curve the texture as it should. That way i have tested with photoshop, and it doesn't look "hilly".

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
26th September, 2012 at 26/09/2012 18:42:41 -

It's hard to believe, but the flames look even better. As far as royalty free screams go, by a good mic, and drop a weight on your foot!

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
27th September, 2012 at 27/09/2012 19:35:39 -

I thing i wont need the sound that bad

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
28th September, 2012 at 28/09/2012 15:02:45 -

I was thinking about adding something in the project.

What would you think if in some point of the game you'd find a secret nazi superweapon/vehicle? The technology for them would have came from a crashed ufo, or from a nazi time machine. And i have planned a mission where you are in the middle of a nazi biology studying center (human studies) and all the sudden the dead "customers" would wake up as zombies or hostile mutants.. the virus that made it happen came from the crashed ufo/from the future. A little like in Far Cry 1 or Crysis(first normal ww2-wargame, then scifi-ww2-wargame).

Is that something you wouldn't want to see in a war game?



Image

Flak cannon
Image


 
[Signature][/Signature]

Chloe Sagal

under the influence of FUN

Registered
  19/02/2009
Points
  607

Orange
29th September, 2012 at 29/09/2012 02:15:28 -


Originally Posted by hapsi

I have this flat green golf field terrain. Any advice how to get it little(just a little) mountanious like in Total Annihilation's 2d maps:
Image



I wrote a tutorial, just for you

http://www.create-games.com/forum_post.asp?id=296083

 
Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/chloesagal
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChloeSagal

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
29th September, 2012 at 29/09/2012 11:09:23 -

It is a good tutorial thank you.. let's see what i come up with.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
4th October, 2012 at 04/10/2012 09:44:09 -


Originally Posted by Chris Donovan
It's hard to believe, but the flames look even better. As far as royalty free screams go, by a good mic, and drop a weight on your foot!


Found a good "royalty free" sound but i think it might be actually from command & conuquer 1, witch would make it not royalty free: http://www.flashkit.com/soundfx/People/Screams/Man_scre-feetu-7985/index.php

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
12th October, 2012 at 12/10/2012 18:15:59 -

Using Maschinengewehr 1942 to do some massacre.
Image

 
[Signature][/Signature]
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click