I read a post that they have been disabled, Thats pretty annoying really, cause I liked to include my nice small banner in my sig (looks good heh)- and I bet many others do too! - what I'm saying is please enable them again, but perhaps put a limit on how big they should be, that way we don't get any HUGE pics clogging up the forums..
I think Shadowcasters right in doing this. There were lots of people in the past who had obsenely HUGE signatures due to a giant image, and Ive told countless people to get rid of them.
well in that case maybe they could automatically be resized like the avatars. But then again, i kno nothing about html or web page design, so poo
Death in the air
Strapped in the electric chair
This can't be happening to me
Who made you God to say
"I'll take your life from you!!"
Pete Nattress Cheesy Bits img src/uploads/sccheesegif
Registered 23/09/2002
Points 4811
26th September, 2003 at 16:39:30 -
i, too, am deeply distressed with regards to the images in sigs situation. i don't think mine was big or obtrusive, neither is jon's or joe's. surely its possible to do a size limit on them?
Yeah, pete's is not big at all, neithers mine, plus the fact that this is 'our' community and some of us have actually given money to keep it going, I think at least we should have a say on what happens to it (features etc..), maybe make it into a poll ie: next weeks..
Me, Circy, Wong Chung Bang and Shadowcaster seem to be the only people who agree with not having images in sigs. Which is fortunate, because most of those people are admins. I just think they make the page look ugly, make pages take longer to load, and most of all, they make it harder to read the page.
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by the Author.
