The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Daily Click ::. Automatic Deletion
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

Cazra

Crazy?

Registered
  24/07/2002
Points
  4472

Game of the Week WinnerVIP Member
14th March, 2004 at 09:46:35 -

This sounds like an excellent idea. If you have no DC points(submitted nothing), there wouldn't be any trouble for someone to reregister.

 
n/a

Rycon



Registered
  20/09/2002
Points
  996
14th March, 2004 at 12:32:42 -

Even if sombody has submited somthing, I think there account should be deleted and the item they submited should be deleted aswell (save articles). I know there would be alot of stuff deleted off the site, but unless the game is really good, I rather play a game that sombody made in the community.

 
We are the music makers, we are the dreamers of dreams...

Kramy



Registered
  08/06/2002
Points
  1888
14th March, 2004 at 17:48:42 -

I agree with istvan, but if you have to leave for a few months for some reason, and come back to find all yours games/articles gone, it would suck. So aslong as nothing has been submitted, go right ahead.

 
Kramy

AndyUK

Mascot Maniac

Registered
  01/08/2002
Points
  14586

Game of the Week WinnerSecond GOTW AwardHas Donated, Thank You!VIP Member
14th March, 2004 at 19:44:41 -

keeping a time count on each user and deleting those who are still at a newbie rating may be a good idea, since a newbie hasnt done much there wont be much for them too miss when/if they return. and the majority of the users that never return will be at a newbie rating.

those with higher than newbie ratings should in theory visit more often and wouldnt ever reach the required time for deletion.

 
.

istvan



Registered
  03/07/2003
Points
  1540
14th March, 2004 at 20:20:42 -

Hah I think I may have found a flaw in my original plan. Programming an inbuilt timer for EVERY user could possibly take up more space than an inactive user. However there would be less timers if it only recorded 'newbie' status, but seeing most users are noobs this mighten make much difference.
Someone mentioned that the admins could do a monthly check of any users you havent been active for a set ammount of time. Although this would be done manually, it could theoretically save space on the server. I dont have any knowledge of how websites run or are programmed, but its good to hear a lot of agreement.
So I think its time for us to all hold hands, and make love not war...or we could just stick to the idea. Either way would end up pretty sticky...

 
'oh yeah? he's thrown a kettle over a pub, what have you done?'

Muz



Registered
  14/02/2002
Points
  6499

VIP MemberI'm on a BoatI am an April FoolHonored Admin Alumnus
14th March, 2004 at 20:22:32 -

I think people should be deleted after a period of time has passed. The limit could be something like (6+(DC points)*2) months. So, someone with 0 DC points can be deleted after 6 months, but the guys with 20 DC points stay for around 26 months without doing anything. I mean there are guys around here who just hang around the forum and post stuff without a single DC point.

 
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.

Image

ShadowCaster

Possibly Insane

Registered
  02/01/2002
Points
  2203
15th March, 2004 at 04:29:00 -

This was something I had considered some time ago (back when the database was only 20mb ) to free up space and make accessing the database faster. Though as was mentioned I would probably get complaints if someone happened to be deleted that was planning to "come back" to their account O__o So I settled with writing three other SQL scripts that delete idle posts in the forums (that is, replys to topics that have been deleted), idle comments (comments on news, articles, downloads, etc, where the parent has been deleted), and idle thumbs, which deletes votes for games that have been removed.

I still go through and remove old stuff every now and then... i.e. during last years cleanout there were several thousand DC messages which were years old and hadn't been deleted by the recipient. Old forum posts also get deleted, but that's about it.

I suppose I could make a script to remove the users that havent been active in say, 12 months, but I dont know if that would greatly improve performance moreso than the other scripts. Though if people specifically want a name that has been registered and out-of-use for some time I might just do that.

Mike

 
"Now I guess we're... 'Path-E-Tech Management'" -Dilbert

Muz



Registered
  14/02/2002
Points
  6499

VIP MemberI'm on a BoatI am an April FoolHonored Admin Alumnus
15th March, 2004 at 04:57:32 -

12 months is a very, very, very long time. It's sad seeing people who go about referring to a year so lightly. I've only lived for about 17 and a half years or so.

 
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.

Image

istvan



Registered
  03/07/2003
Points
  1540
16th March, 2004 at 22:39:38 -

Another name change Muz?

Yeah, I agree 12 months is too long. I cant see why someone would be angry if they were deleted from a site they hadnt contributed to atall, and who havent been active for say 6 months.

 
'oh yeah? he's thrown a kettle over a pub, what have you done?'
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click