The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Daily Click ::. Repu-what?!
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

Flava



Registered
  30/07/2002
Points
  684

Has Donated, Thank You!Code MonkeyVIP MemberThe Cake is a LieThe Spinster
14th July, 2007 at 12:00:19 -

Breaking a rule, gives you a negative point.
Redeeming yourself, gives you a positive point.
If you reach -3 points, you'll be banned.

 
This is a signature. Have this one on me.

Peblo

Custom ratings must be 50 characters or less

Registered
  05/07/2002
Points
  185

Game of the Week WinnerVIP MemberI'm on a Boat360 OwnerAttention GetterThe Cake is a LieCardboard BoxHero of TimePS3 OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!
I'm a Storm TrooperSonic SpeedStrawberryI like Aliens!Wii OwnerMushroomGhostbuster!
14th July, 2007 at 12:06:28 -

Then yes, positive points would only be ban protection and not just something cool to collect.

 
"Isn't it always amazing how we characterize a person's intelligence by how closely their thinking matches ours?"
~Belgarath

Flava



Registered
  30/07/2002
Points
  684

Has Donated, Thank You!Code MonkeyVIP MemberThe Cake is a LieThe Spinster
14th July, 2007 at 12:07:51 -

The main idea of the system was for warning people - I may very well make it so you can't go over 0 points and keep it simply as a warning system.

 
This is a signature. Have this one on me.

Peblo

Custom ratings must be 50 characters or less

Registered
  05/07/2002
Points
  185

Game of the Week WinnerVIP MemberI'm on a Boat360 OwnerAttention GetterThe Cake is a LieCardboard BoxHero of TimePS3 OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!
I'm a Storm TrooperSonic SpeedStrawberryI like Aliens!Wii OwnerMushroomGhostbuster!
14th July, 2007 at 12:12:23 -

You'd might as well make it red marks if the number can only represent 4 numbers, 0 to -3. Just um, suggestions.

 
"Isn't it always amazing how we characterize a person's intelligence by how closely their thinking matches ours?"
~Belgarath

-Liam-

Cake Addict

Registered
  06/12/2008
Points
  556

Wii OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!Hero of TimeStrawberry
14th July, 2007 at 12:20:07 -

I agree with the Peblo.

 
Image

Tell 'em Babs is 'ere...

Flava



Registered
  30/07/2002
Points
  684

Has Donated, Thank You!Code MonkeyVIP MemberThe Cake is a LieThe Spinster
14th July, 2007 at 12:23:05 -

Hmm good idea..
So like this?

Image



 
This is a signature. Have this one on me.

Joe.H

Evil Faker

Registered
  19/08/2002
Points
  3305
14th July, 2007 at 12:23:59 -

lol peblo got warned

 
My signature is never too big!!!

Peblo

Custom ratings must be 50 characters or less

Registered
  05/07/2002
Points
  185

Game of the Week WinnerVIP MemberI'm on a Boat360 OwnerAttention GetterThe Cake is a LieCardboard BoxHero of TimePS3 OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!
I'm a Storm TrooperSonic SpeedStrawberryI like Aliens!Wii OwnerMushroomGhostbuster!
14th July, 2007 at 12:24:43 -

Yeah, but if you could change my rating to something else that'd be perfect.

 
"Isn't it always amazing how we characterize a person's intelligence by how closely their thinking matches ours?"
~Belgarath

Billybobjoe198



Registered
  12/01/2007
Points
  221
14th July, 2007 at 12:29:03 -

Reputations? I didn't even know we had warnings!

 
n/a

Radix

hot for teacher

Registered
  01/10/2003
Points
  3139

Has Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!GOTW WINNER CUP 4!
14th July, 2007 at 12:29:13 -

And if you have any other ideas for moderation, please do tell us.
Just stop overmoderating. Keeping a handle on illegal content and deliberatly disruptive behaviour is one thing. Censoring posts you don't like is annoying. Deleting posts that criticise you is despicable. It needs to be remembered that TDC is a website that services a community, it isn't a self-contained community itself. If it were things would be completely different.

If I call peblo a worthless --, is the server going to crash? no it isn't. And just because you try to prevent me doing so doesn't mean I don't still think he is, and it isn't going to change the way I feel. All it leads to is snarky - like Tim sniping and bitching at every opportunity. Is that better?

Look, I know I'm being an idealist here. This is a private site and there's nothing wrong with it having rules. But I have no idea what those rules are supposed to be, since there seem to be magic, invisible, or secret ones more and more lately.

What I'd like to know is, where exactly is the damn problem you're reacting to? Ignoring phizzy's eccentricities, have we really been having problems with racism or crapflooding or child pornography or some other world-ending shit? Things have gone smoothly here for years. Drama is a constant in any community, but it really sucks when it's moderator-generated.

-------------------------------------------------

It's late and I might have gone overboard. I actually meant to talk to you about this on MSN before posting in this threa, but you weren't on. By all means go on adding site features, you're awesome that way, but can we either back off on the moderation stuff or come up with a concrete set of rules (which the ADMINS OBEY TOO, meaning no more "because I feel like it" bans or censorship)?
Actually, if I catch you on later I've got an incomplete site design document some of us were working on as a potential replacement for TDC, which probably has a number of features that would be worth consideration.

You've posted as I type:
The main idea of the system was for warning people - I may very well make it so you can't go over 0 points and keep it simply as a warning system.
PLEASE YES. Then the label can become "warnings" or "warning points", and this idea will be vastly improved.

Image Edited by an Administrator.

 
n/a

Radix

hot for teacher

Registered
  01/10/2003
Points
  3139

Has Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!GOTW WINNER CUP 4!
14th July, 2007 at 12:33:33 -

Sure you are, you just totally ruined the edit I was trying to add:

Edit: yeah, just like that. Though I still think periodic automatic deiteration would be better than a subjective mechanism.

 
n/a

Flava



Registered
  30/07/2002
Points
  684

Has Donated, Thank You!Code MonkeyVIP MemberThe Cake is a LieThe Spinster
14th July, 2007 at 12:34:07 -

I see your point - but the fact is, you and Phizzy are not the only people who visit this site. You may not find the comments offensive, others do - we have to deal with it and that's what we're trying to do. We can't make everyone happy, but do what we think is right.

We try not to censor people here - you know that, you can't say otherwise. People here use bad language every day, and call each other names, but we currently only have 3 people banned on this site. So to say we're over-moderating isn't true at all, in my opinion.

People who constantly call other's names - such as cunts, paedos or insult others about their weight and things - deserved to be censored. Not just on this website, but on any website.

Image Edited by an Administrator.

 
This is a signature. Have this one on me.

Peblo

Custom ratings must be 50 characters or less

Registered
  05/07/2002
Points
  185

Game of the Week WinnerVIP MemberI'm on a Boat360 OwnerAttention GetterThe Cake is a LieCardboard BoxHero of TimePS3 OwnerIt's-a me, Mario!
I'm a Storm TrooperSonic SpeedStrawberryI like Aliens!Wii OwnerMushroomGhostbuster!
14th July, 2007 at 12:38:04 -

Billybob should be warned for page stretching.

 
"Isn't it always amazing how we characterize a person's intelligence by how closely their thinking matches ours?"
~Belgarath

Ski

TDC is my stress ball

Registered
  13/03/2005
Points
  10130

GOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!KlikCast HelperVIP MemberWii OwnerStrawberryPicture Me This Round 28 Winner!PS3 OwnerI am an April Fool
Candy Cane
14th July, 2007 at 12:38:10 -

Wow, awesome use of swearing.

 
n/a

Joe.H

Evil Faker

Registered
  19/08/2002
Points
  3305
14th July, 2007 at 12:45:42 -

you couldn't, for example, call somebody a big fat cunty paedophile flap face?

Awesome.

also your warnings image is broken, mr flava (or at least it is in the topic review bit)

 
My signature is never too big!!!
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click