I have no problem at all with a person not liking my game, but i do have a problem with people saying stuff like this without being constructive. I think this sort of behaviour is extremely immature. So anyways, just letting out some steam. Can it really be that people can be however immature they please ?
I have had bad experiences with Nuklear Productions (the guy who wrote that review) personally i think articles, previews and reviews should be checked by an admin aswell! Because alot of cra* is getting let in, i have seen reviews that just go: p_aijiioquoiu9i2-]324=32[r;['a#;'. @;':L'
To fill out the new minimum word count.
There should be someone checking what gets let in.
Anyone agree?
not to forget the review Rhys D gave TOR, all because i gave his game a bad review (which was constructive critisism). but Pete couldnt remove it because its his power of free speech. no offence to pete he's just doing his job but why cant we just have a no bullshit rule?
If it was up to me, every game would get over 5/10, no matter what. Every game has something good in it, even Punch It, because that gives everyone an excuse to kill the creator for crimes against humanity.
I agree. My first thought, when reading the "review", was "why on earth doesn't these things require admin approvals. But then again, these kinda reviews are an excellent way to get points ... >_<
If you have a problem with a review you've received, DC-mail me - if it's an invalid review I'll remove it.
I'm unsure what to do about that one - I do want to delete it as it's atrociously written and barely understandable, but it does offer an opinion on the game, however invalid.
Actually, it's going - if Nuklear's reading this, it's for the first reason, not the second.
Jambo- I think its already a pain to have games being checked, first off, they dont even make sure they pass standerds, they just check it, if the discription is longer then 2 words, it passes! Not to mention that the admins are never willing to accept more help via letting games through & keeping crap from reaching DC, so having them check articles, previews, & reviews would be a waste.
Phizzy- Why would you need to delete a review just to keep points that dont mean crap?
Get fucked Jay. If yours was constructive critisism then so was mine. Fucking tool. Stop pretending you're Mr. Perfect.
And Mr. Wong Chung Bang if you could so politely remove Jay's review from my game Milber 2, as you have done to my review on his game TOR, it would be kindly appreciated.
People rate games too fucking high. If I see a game that gets 8 or 9/10 I want to download it and be impressed in some way. Unfortunately the majority of reviews here seem to be bullshit in another way. I don't know if it's just friends of the creators rating high, or people with no clue who are easily impressed, but it basically renders reviews here useless. The reason I don't do reviews often is because I'd very, very rarely give over six, and someone would be bound to take offense.
There's plenty of games that do, of course, deserve very high marks, but I just wish people could be more objective generally.
Advertisement
Edited by the Author.
